Big 12 Commissioner Comments on Peach Bowl Targeting Controversy

The Peach Bowl clash between Arizona State and Texas concluded with a thrilling double-overtime finish, but a controversial no-call on a potential targeting penalty has sparked widespread debate. With the Longhorns ultimately securing a 39-31 victory, the incident has prompted scrutiny of officiating standards, particularly from Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark.

The Controversial Play

• In the final moments of the fourth quarter, Arizona State wide receiver Melquan Stovall caught a pass and was hit by Texas defender Michael Taaffe at midfield.
• The collision involved Taaffe’s helmet striking Stovall, who was deemed a defenseless player.
• Officials reviewed the play but chose not to assess a targeting penalty, allowing Texas to regain possession and eventually secure the win.

Yormark Calls for Standardized CFP Officiating

Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark issued a statement addressing the contentious no-call:

“I have had multiple discussions seeking clarity surrounding the targeting call on Arizona State’s final drive of the 4th quarter with Richard Clark. Moving forward, we need to address CFP officiating to ensure national standards are developed. These standards will be crucial to the CFP’s future, and I look forward to discussing them with my fellow committee members when we meet next.”

The Peach Bowl featured Big Ten referees, raising questions about inconsistencies across conferences.

Targeting Rule and Debate

• NCAA Rulebook Definition: Targeting involves a forcible hit with the crown of the helmet or a hit to the head or neck area of a defenseless player.
• Despite its intention to protect athletes, the rule remains one of the most subjective and contentious in football.

Even Arizona State head coach Kenny Dillingham voiced his confusion:

“I’m going to be honest, I don’t know what targeting is. But I do want to protect the players, so whatever rules that protect the players, I’m all about.”

Fan and Analyst Reactions

Most observers believed the hit met the criteria for targeting, further intensifying calls for reform in officiating procedures.

The no-call not only impacted the outcome of the Peach Bowl but also spotlighted broader concerns about fairness and consistency in college football officiating.

Implications for the CFP and Officiating Standards

Yormark’s comments suggest that improving officiating standards will be a priority as the College Football Playoff (CFP) expands to a 12-team format in 2025. Clearer guidelines and enforcement mechanisms could reduce such controversies in high-stakes games.

The incident serves as a reminder of the critical role officiating plays in preserving the integrity and safety of the game. Whether this controversy leads to meaningful changes remains to be seen.